Then you don't want to miss this: A TwitFest With The Chief UNFCC Thermageddon Monger:
Oh, and after I alerted my twitter minions of the pending fun, I got this from a finicky Finn...
Too bad, I always liked Sibelius.
Soylent Green: Just what you need when you're freezing in the dark.That was the title and tagline to my original blog launched March 4, 2009. Then, as now, I railed against the Carbon Kelptocrats and their patron, God/King Obamandias of the Chicago Carbon Exchange, who I knew would destroy the nation's energy infrastructure with a non-energy policy promising free power generated from unicorn farts and sunbeams.
Marxists have never had a better argument against capitalism than this inescapable and apocalyptic “contradiction.” Solutions to the ecological crisis are blindingly obvious but we can’t take the necessary steps to prevent ecological collapse because, so long as we live under capitalism, economic growth has to take priority over ecological concerns.That's right, the economic system that increased life expectancy four-fold will kill us all because there's just too much freedom going on here. Polio anyone?
Funny, every Marxist country I had the (mis)fortune to travel through back in the 80's to early 90's was an environmental shithole. Staring at the noontime sun in a cloudless sky through a thick fog of coal smoke that every building was burning for heat in Beijing, green wiggly things coming out of the water tap in Shanghi, fields where nothing could be grown due to heavy metal sludge in Poland, and let’s not forget the Marxist environmental masterpiece of Chernobyl. Yes, we need the Marxists to step in and destroy the environment to save the environment. Much like they step in and destroy people to save people.
And thanks for all the snooch.
"U.S. emissions in Pennsylvania are causing floods in other areas," Brown said, but the mainstream environmental movement and the press do not raise awareness of this issue. Instead they operate within the debate framed by those who oppose action on climate change, he said. (Emphasis mine.)That's right, no one--not even the "mainstream environmental movement"--will back him up on this scientifically baseless claim. But Brown has an out...
"We will only solve this problem," he said, "when we have a social movement that demonizes the unjustifiable use of energy."H/T Junk Science